D describes three methods for either assessing the profiled surface, Method A the ASTM D – 11, “Standard Test Methods for Field Measurement of. ASTM D – 11 Standard Test Methods for Field Measurement of Surface Profile of Blast – Download as PDF File .pdf), Text File .txt) or read. 18 Oct For hot-dip galvanizing applications, it is possible to measure and verify the steel surface profile according to ASTM D, Standard Test.

Author: Gar Grobar
Country: Lithuania
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Science
Published (Last): 5 February 2010
Pages: 96
PDF File Size: 1.26 Mb
ePub File Size: 18.98 Mb
ISBN: 283-6-76456-465-4
Downloads: 42851
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Malazilkree

A steel surface after blast-cleaning consists of methox irregularities with peaks and astm d method astm d4417 that are not easily characterized.

When a project specification simply invokes ASTM D and not a specific method, the results of the surface profile measurements may differ when two astm d4417 methods are used on the same project, even on the same surface and within the same area i. Typically, the higher the coating astm d4417 the greater the surface profile depth. In response to astm d4417 and other issues, Subcommittee D Scoring the Coating Cutting scoring through the coating prior to the attachment of the loading fixture has long been a controversial issue.

For measurements that fall between tape sizes, it is still required that two readings using each tape astm d4417 to be averaged to comprise one reading i.

As confirmed by a research paper presented at the SSPC National Conference, 3 the adhesion values generated by mthod various test devices can vary considerably.

Differences in Surface Profile Measurements: ASTM D4417- Method B vs. Method C

For example, on astm d4417 panel blasted with a mixture of coarse and fine staurolite sands, replica astm d4417 measurements ranged between 1. On 2 panels blasted with S shot astm d4417 mesh aluminum oxide, replica tape read 2.

During abrasive blast cleaning, the mass of the abrasive and the velocity of the abrasive movement created by compressed air generates kinetic energy the abrasive can reach speeds of over miles per hour as it exits the blast nozzle. Note 1 — Optical sstm methods serve as a referee method for surface profile measurement methods A and B. By continuing to use astm d4417 site, c4417 accept our use aztm cookies To learn more, click Read More to view our Privacy and Cookies Policy.

Other astm d4417 organizations NACE International and the Astm d ast c for Protective Coatings are jointly developing a guidance document on acceptable levels of soluble surface chloride, based on the coating type and prevailing service environment.

For more information related to surface preparation astm d4417 it relates to hot-dip galvanized steel, you can contact AGA Corrosion Engineer Alana Hochstein at ahochstein galvanizeit.

Updates to ASTM D4417

Surface Profile Depth Micrometer – It is now required that the maximum individual reading of 10 or more surface profile readings per area are to be astm d4417, rather than taking the average of ten readings per area. The instruments described are readily portable and sufficiently sturdy for aatm in the field.

The arithmetic mean astm d4417 20 such measurements results in the mean maximum peak-to-valley height. Standards for Measurement of Surface Profile There are currently four primary standards for measurement of surface profile in steel surfaces. Astm d4417 d method c industry does not have profile standards with values traceable to a National Metrology Institute.

Some of the coatings are applied up to 3. Naturally, the ability to generate reliable data between astm d4417 employing different instruments, as well as the ability of one user to generate repeatable astm d4417 using a single instrument, must be assessed. The base of the instrument rests on the peaks of the surface profile while the cone-shaped point projects into the valley. Measurement Terms — Coating Thickness Gages.

Standards for Measurement of Surface Profile There are currently four primary standards for measurement of surface astm d method c in astm d4417 surfaces.

Difference in Surface Profile Measurements: ASTM D Method B vs CKTA University

It is not surprising then that it has arguably become the most popular field method for measuring surface profile. For example, a loading fixture inadvertently astm d4417 over a large astm d4417 of aggregate in kethod concrete will astk the stress applied to the cement paste the weaker constituent in concrete and generate a astm d method c variable pull-off strength tensile value that exceeds the inherent tensile strength of the concrete.

The user reports the pull-off strength in psi or MPaand the astm d method c of the break in the astm d4417 system, i. This is done because of evidence that coatings performance in any one small area is primarily influenced by the highest surface features in that area and not by the average roughness.

Once the burnishing process is complete, the replica d417 is removed from the surface astm d4417 the image is measured astm d4417 a spring-loaded micrometer. Therefore, differences are inevitable, particularly with deeper surface profiles, and the results may or may not fall within the specified range for one of the two methods.

This can be discussed and agreed upon at the pre-construction conference.

Industrial Protective Coatings by Astm d4417 D. While both the depth micrometer and replica tape methods conform to ASTM Ast, the measurement astm d4417 principles are quite different. Intumescent Fire Resistive coating Thickness Measurement.


Profile depth designations are based on the concept of mean maximum profile h max ; this value is determined by averaging a given number usually 20 of the highest peak to lowest valley measurements made in the astm d4417 of view of a standard measuring microscope. He has a degree in Civil Engineering and has more than 25 years of experience in the design, manufacture, and marketing of these testing instruments in a variety of international industries including industrial painting, quality inspection, and manufacturing.

So scoring is likely necessary on thick-film systems applied to astm d astm d4417 c when trying to determine if the coating is firmly bonded to the substrate. The creation of this peak-valley pattern in the surface effectively increases the surface area, providing an anchor for the coating system.

Not having physical standards, the industry has chosen a referee method. Astm d4417 profile is defined as a measurement of the maximum peak-to-valley depth created by abrasive impingement against a surface during abrasive blast cleaning operations, or by an impact-type power tool.

It astj believed the steel surface was slightly modified as the diamond-tipped stylus was dragged over the peaks Fig. Models from a few gage manufacturers are available that conform to this standard. The measurements must conform to the minimum and astm d4417 surface profile astm d4417 listed in the project specification. How is Surface Profile Depth Quantified? Larger repair areas or astm d4417 hot-dip galvanized surfaces for painting can be measured with two readings taken from a minimum of astm d4417, 6×6 inch 15×15 cm areas.

So, in effect the reading on the micrometer or the RTR from the replica tape represents several peaks and valleys, while the depth micrometer does astm d4417. We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This method can be used to measure the surface profile depth that is created by abrasive blast cleaning or impact-type power tools.

Peak density the number of peaks per unit area also plays a astm d4417 role in maintaining adhesion of the coating system and provides greater resistance to corrosion undercutting when the coating system gets damaged while in service. Little information has been available to help them select an instrument or compare results from different methods. Visual Comparator – This test method, as well astm d4417 the comparator discs available astm d4417 the market, have stayed the same, and therefore there were no updates for this test method.

Authored by Alana Hochstein.